As a small or midsize business owner, it is crucial to be aware of the legal implications and penalties associated with breaking employment laws. A recent settlement involving a staffing business serves as a reminder of the severe consequences of disability discrimination and retaliation.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that it revoked a disabled employee’s accommodations and terminated her after she questioned the decision. By understanding the penalties for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), business owners can safeguard their employees’ rights and avoid costly legal entanglements.
![](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5d94e703af5055407ad48830/c883da1e-5bb9-4b7c-a3f3-204f6a470e47/Blog+Banner_Get+Started.png)
The Lawsuit and Allegations
A staffing provider for a testing center in North Carolina, has agreed to pay $42,000 and provide relief to settle the disability discrimination and retaliation lawsuit brought by the EEOC.
The EEOC’s complaint stated that the employee, who worked as a part-time testing center administrator, was granted reasonable accommodations for her disability upon hiring. However, a new supervisor rescinded some of the previously granted accommodations in the fall of 2019.
When the employee questioned this decision, the staffing business disciplined her and reduced her work hours. Subsequently, just six days after the employee complained about discriminatory actions in writing, the staffing business terminated her employment.
Violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The alleged conduct by the staffing business violated the ADA, which mandates that employers provide reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities. Employers must ensure that employees with disabilities have equal opportunities in the workplace and cannot retaliate against them for seeking accommodations or questioning discriminatory actions.
Settlement Terms and Compliance Measures
In addition to the monetary settlement, the two-year consent decree includes provisions to prevent future discrimination and retaliation. The staffing business is prohibited from engaging in discriminatory and retaliatory practices against employees in violation of the ADA. The company must adopt and implement a new policy addressing non-discrimination, non-retaliation, and disability accommodations.
Additionally, the staffing business will provide training to all managers and employees to ensure compliance with the ADA and promote a more inclusive work environment.
Importance of Training and Effective Policies
This case highlights the importance of proper training for managers on their duty to provide reasonable accommodations under the ADA. Employers must also ensure that any existing accommodations are communicated to new managers when there are changes in personnel. By educating management and fostering an inclusive workplace culture, business owners can prevent potential legal issues and protect the rights of their employees with disabilities.
Conclusion
Small and midsize business owners must familiarize themselves with the penalties for disability discrimination and retaliation in the workplace. The settlement reached with the staffing business serves as a reminder that violating the ADA can lead to significant financial consequences and damage to a company’s reputation.
By upholding the principles of equal opportunity and providing reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, businesses can create an environment that values diversity and compliance with employment laws. The EEOC remains committed to enforcing the ADA and holding employers accountable for any violations, emphasizing the importance of protecting employees’ rights in the workplace.